Static sag vs Rider sag, which is most important? susp tuning...

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

m0lt3n

Grey Hound
WD Supporter
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
9,663
Reaction score
1,763
Location
Kathu (NC)
Bike
KTM 1290 Adventure R
I see suspension tuning is a complete new science and I find it very interesting.

So after chatting to a buddy that knows more than me I am a bit confused... here is my noob opinion:
1; I don't see the use of even measuring static sag as its a function of the weight of the bike and not bike plus rider, I have only been looking at, and setting, rider sag to 30%; Is this incorrect?

My reasoning is if static sag is incorrect and rider sag is correct, you cant fix it without hardware changes. also, I dont see the use of it as actually riding the bike you will be on the bike, iow static sag is never relevant?



2; and on rider sag, should front and rear be the same? will slightly more on rear help with sand stability (makes sense to me)?

3; and on harsh riding over corrugations, what helps most? less preload or less compression (I lowered fast compression) or less or more rebound?

4; if I have some suspension gurus' focus, any tips on fine tuning rebound?
 
Top