Serf said:
Nice RR! :thumleft:
I see there was a mix of bikes and i don't want to start comparing the different bikes as the capability of the individuals propably made the biggest difference.
In your opinion, how did the 990's compare to the 690's. Obviously the 990's would be nicer on the long open stretches and the 690's easier to ride in the technical bits. But after 3000 km's it will be interesting to hear your observation between those 2 types.
Thanks,
I don't have Stefan's ability to ride a 990 on these roads, (bakkies in lowrange 1st gear), but from a "gewone ou" perspective:
Before we left I owned both a 990 and a 690, and most advice from experienced friends was to take the 690, until I phoned Stefan, his words was that it is only Van Zyls that is on the limits of a 990's paramaters of design. Van Zyls was a breeze on my 990, the continuous sand was hard work, not difficult but hard work, ride a 2track road with lots of curves(draaie) for eight hours, you got to have some state of fitness and of course experience.
I owned various bikes from various makes and models, the continuous debate about the ideal adventure bike is over, I will never partake in any discussion ever again, my biggest concern is what will happen the day that there is no more 990R.
In want to repeat what I said before, I can not describe what pleasure I experienced riding my 990R on these roads, the complete package of power, balance, forgiveness with an upgraded front suspension from Hilton, there must be a law against something as good as this, my values for the previously important things in my life are now in a process of reevaluation :ricky:
PS, I am very very very glad I listened to Stefan and not ride my 690 :mwink: