Jacko
Grey Hound
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2006
- Messages
- 6,135
- Reaction score
- 47
- Location
- Denver, Colorado
- Bike
- Hildebrand & Wolfmuller (all models)
Marco I don't want to sound like a prick, but since the ice has already been broken in that regard, may I reply to your statements.
1. The BMW jacket is very nice, even if a lot of Lifestylers wear them. Fortunately they're all migrating to the New! Santiago kit. Or the Rallye II. Like the old toppie I did the Intermediate course with some years ago. Whole BMW kit, Ralley II jacket & pants, Savannah boots, flip up helmet. On a F650. Then the Saturday afternoon he bails out 'cos he's "too tired." F***n bwhaaa.
2. Yes, I have also read the BMW article on the BMW WEBSITE, written by BMW PEOPLE. I have also ridden a 1200 ADV (with Jan staal, amongst others) in Namibian sand. I have actually written tho odd article about these things in a professional manner. As a 1200 GS owner I can unequivocally state that what these guys claim is at best misleading, or at worst, pure, unadulterated horseshit.
They, amongst other things wrote:
"But all agree it's more stable than the 1200GS. The bulk makes it steadier, pushing through dirt and on corrugated road it's not so shaky. "
Like the one guy who's a big cog in the BMW Lifestyle world (as in for a career) once told me over a coffee (he too doesn't drink...): "You can do things with the 1150 GS off road that you can't with a F650 - because of it's stability & weight...". Yes, because the F650 isn't that hardcore. The F650 XChallenge will rock. Obviously.
Then, when the lighter 1200Adv and HP2 came out he gushed about their lighter weight and how they'll handle better because of it. F*** huh?
Let's analyse another statement in this article: "The R1200GS is the all-purpose bike, tackling anything from commuting to tracking. The overall feeling was that the front steering and handle bars get unstable."
This is true of the Adventure too. Unless the 14 or so ones at the media launch were different to the ones you guys have bought.
Further: " They all regarded the 1200GS as the 'softie' of the pack. It is difficult to handle in thick sandy conditions but is a good comfortable touring bike on long tarmac distances."
How on earth can something with EXACTLY the same wheels, suspension geometry - but with 20 - 40 kgs less weight, depending on fuel load, be more difficult to handle in the sand?
I'm excitedly waiting for your input in this regard.
There's a very simple correlation between off-road motorcycles and weight, all things being equal: Less = better
The only mechanical differences between the Adv and the normal 1200 GS are:
* Bigger tank
* Higher output alternator (to run more electrical thingys)
* Different looks
* Better crash protection
* Better wind protection
* 10 mm more suspension travel - to compensate for heavier probable loads.
* Higher porkiness factor on the scale.
* More advanced trip computer
How this can make it "better" off-road is beyond me.
You wrote:
[/quote]GPSs are great, but I believe that navigation is way older that this new born electronic tool.
1. The BMW jacket is very nice, even if a lot of Lifestylers wear them. Fortunately they're all migrating to the New! Santiago kit. Or the Rallye II. Like the old toppie I did the Intermediate course with some years ago. Whole BMW kit, Ralley II jacket & pants, Savannah boots, flip up helmet. On a F650. Then the Saturday afternoon he bails out 'cos he's "too tired." F***n bwhaaa.
2. Yes, I have also read the BMW article on the BMW WEBSITE, written by BMW PEOPLE. I have also ridden a 1200 ADV (with Jan staal, amongst others) in Namibian sand. I have actually written tho odd article about these things in a professional manner. As a 1200 GS owner I can unequivocally state that what these guys claim is at best misleading, or at worst, pure, unadulterated horseshit.
They, amongst other things wrote:
"But all agree it's more stable than the 1200GS. The bulk makes it steadier, pushing through dirt and on corrugated road it's not so shaky. "
Like the one guy who's a big cog in the BMW Lifestyle world (as in for a career) once told me over a coffee (he too doesn't drink...): "You can do things with the 1150 GS off road that you can't with a F650 - because of it's stability & weight...". Yes, because the F650 isn't that hardcore. The F650 XChallenge will rock. Obviously.
Then, when the lighter 1200Adv and HP2 came out he gushed about their lighter weight and how they'll handle better because of it. F*** huh?
Let's analyse another statement in this article: "The R1200GS is the all-purpose bike, tackling anything from commuting to tracking. The overall feeling was that the front steering and handle bars get unstable."
This is true of the Adventure too. Unless the 14 or so ones at the media launch were different to the ones you guys have bought.
Further: " They all regarded the 1200GS as the 'softie' of the pack. It is difficult to handle in thick sandy conditions but is a good comfortable touring bike on long tarmac distances."
How on earth can something with EXACTLY the same wheels, suspension geometry - but with 20 - 40 kgs less weight, depending on fuel load, be more difficult to handle in the sand?
I'm excitedly waiting for your input in this regard.
There's a very simple correlation between off-road motorcycles and weight, all things being equal: Less = better
The only mechanical differences between the Adv and the normal 1200 GS are:
* Bigger tank
* Higher output alternator (to run more electrical thingys)
* Different looks
* Better crash protection
* Better wind protection
* 10 mm more suspension travel - to compensate for heavier probable loads.
* Higher porkiness factor on the scale.
* More advanced trip computer
How this can make it "better" off-road is beyond me.
You wrote:
[/quote]GPSs are great, but I believe that navigation is way older that this new born electronic tool.
You're trolling, aren't you? Please say you're pulling my leg? Please?